Connectionist Approaches to Understanding Aphasic Perseveration

ABSTRACT

Aphasic patients make a variety of speech errors, including perseverations, in tasks that involve a linguistic component. What do perseverative and other errors imply about the nature of the neurologically damaged and intact language systems? Here we discuss the insights into the mechanisms of aphasic perseveration afforded by connectionist models. As a base for discussion, we review the Plaut and Shallice model of optic aphasic errors in object naming, which relies primarily on short-term learning mechanisms to produce perseverations. We then point out limitations of the model in addressing more recent data collected on aphasic perseveration and explain how incorporating information about the interaction of neuromodulatory systems and learning in the brain may help to overcome these limitations.

KEYWORDS

Aphasia - connectionist - neuromodulation - perseveration - priming

REFERENCES

• 1 Hudson A J. Perseveration.  Brain. 1968;  91 571-582
• 2 Sandson J, Albert M L. Varieties of perseveration.  Neuropsychologia. 1984;  22 715-732
• 3 Albert M L, Sandson J. Perseveration in aphasia.  Cortex. 1986;  22 103-115
• 4 Cohen L, Dehaene S. Competition between past and present: assessment and interpretation of verbal perseverations.  Brain. 1998;  121 1641-1659
• 5 Gotts S J, Incisa della Rocchetta A, Cipolotti L. Mechanisms underlying perseveration in aphasia: evidence from a single case study.  Neuropsychologia. 2002;  40 1930-1947
• 6 Buckingham H W, Whitaker H, Whitaker H A. On linguistic perseveration. In: Whitaker HA, Whitaker H Studies of Neurolinguistics, Vol. 4. New York; Academic Press 1979: 329-352
• 7 Halpern H. Effect of stimulus variables on verbal perseveration of aphasic subjects.  Percept Mot Skills. 1965;  20 421-429
• 8 Santo Pietro M J, Rigrodsky S. The effects of temporal and semantic conditions on the occurrence of the error response of perseveration in adult aphasics.  J Speech Hear Res. 1982;  25 184-192
• 9 Lhermitte F, Beauvois M F. A visual-speech disconnexion syndrome: report of a case with optic aphasia, agnosic alexia and colour agnosia.  Brain. 1973;  96 695-714
• 10 Martin N, Roach A, Brecher A, Lowery J. Lexical retrieval mechanisms underlying whole-word perseveration errors in anomic aphasia.  Aphasiology. 1998;  12 319-333
• 11 Papagno C, Basso A. Perseveration in two aphasic patients.  Cortex. 1996;  32 67-82
• 12 Basso A. Perseveration or the Tower of Babel.  Semin Speech Lang. 2004;  25 375-390
• 13 Behrmann M, Zemel R S, Mozer M C. Object-based attention and occlusion: Evidence from normal participants and a computational model.  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1998;  24 1011-1036
• 14 Vecera S P, O'Reilly R C. Figure-ground organization and object recognition processes: an interactive account.  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1998;  24 441-462
• 15 Plaut D C, McClelland J L, Seidenberg M S, Patterson K. Understanding normal and impaired word reading: computational principles in quasi-regular domains.  Psychol Rev. 1996;  103 56-115
• 16 Rohde D LT, Plaut D C. Language acquisition in the absence of explicit negative evidence: how important is starting small?.  Cognition. 1999;  72 67-109
• 17 Dell G S, Schwartz M F, Martin N, Saffran E M, Gagnon D A. Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers.  Psychol Rev. 1997;  104 801-838
• 18 Farah M J, McClelland J L. A computational model of semantic memory impairment: Modality-specificity and emergent category-specificity.  J Exp Psychol Gen. 1991;  120 339-357
• 19 McClelland J L, Rogers T T. The parallel distributed processing approach to semantic cognition.  Nat Rev Neurosci. 2003;  4 310-322
• 20 McRae K, de Sa V R, Seidenberg M S. On the nature and scope of featural representations of word meaning.  J Exp Psychol Gen. 1997;  126 99-130
• 21 Plaut D C. Graded modality-specific specialization in semantics: a computational account of optic aphasia.  Cogn Neuropsychol. 2002;  19 603-639
• 22 McClelland J L, McNaughton B L, O’Reilly R C. Why there are complementary learning systems in the hippocampus and neocortex: insights from the successes and failures of connectionist models of learning and memory.  Psychol Rev. 1995;  102 419-457
• 23 Norman K A, O’Reilly R C. Modeling hippocampal and neocortical contributions to recognition memory: a complementary learning systems approach.  Psychol Rev. 2003;  110 611-646
• 24 Stark C EL, McClelland J L. Repetition priming of words, pseudowords, and nonwords.  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2000;  26 945-972
• 25 Cohen J D, Dunbar K, McClelland J L. On the control of automatic processes: a parallel distributed processing account of the Stroop effect.  Psychol Rev. 1990;  97 332-361
• 26 O'Reilly R C, Noelle D C, Braver T S, Cohen J D. Prefrontal cortex and dynamic categorization tasks: representational organization and neuromodulatory control.  Cereb Cortex. 2002;  12 246-257
• 27 Botvinik M, Plaut D C. Doing without schema hierarchies: a recurrent connectionist approach to normal and impaired routine sequential action.  Psychol Rev. 2004;  111 395-429
• 28 Cohen J D, Servan-Schreiber D. Context, cortex, and dopamine: a connectionist approach to behavior and biology in schizophrenia.  Psychol Rev. 1992;  99 45-77
• 29 Hinton G E, Shallice T. Lesioning an attractor network: investigations of acquired dyslexia.  Psychol Rev. 1991;  98 74-95
• 30 Munakata Y, McClelland J L, Johnson M H, Siegler R S. Rethinking infant knowledge: toward an adaptive process account of successes and failures in object permanence tasks.  Psychol Rev. 1997;  104 686-713
• 31 Plaut D C, Shallice T. Deep dyslexia: a case study of connectionist neuropsychology.  Cogn Neuropsychol. 1993;  10 377-500
• 32 Rogers T T, Lambon Ralph M A, Garrard P et al.. Structure and deterioration of semantic memory: a neuropsychological and computational investigation.  Psychol Rev. 2004;  111 205-235
• 33 Rogers T T, McClelland J L. A parallel distributed processing approach to semantic cognition: applications to conceptual development. In: Gershkoff-Stowe L, Rakison D Building Object Categories in Developmental Time Hillsdale, NJ; Erlbaum 2005 (in press)
• 34 Plaut D C, Shallice T. Perseverative and semantic influences on visual object naming errors in optic aphasia: a connectionist account.  J Cogn Neurosci. 1993;  5 89-117
• 35 Hirsh K W. Perseveration and activation in aphasic speech production.  Cogn Neuropsychol. 1998;  15 377-388
• 36 Gil R, Pluchon C, Toullat G et al.. Visuoverbal disconnection (optical aphasia) for objects, pictures, coloors and faces with abstractive alexia [in French].  Neuropsychologia. 1985;  23 333-349
• 37 Shallice T. The language-to-object perception interface: evidence from Neuropsychology. In: Bloom P, Peterson MA, Nadel L, Garrett MF Language and Space Cambridge, MA; The MIT Press 1995: 531-552
• 38 Hillis A E, Caramazza A. Cognitive and neural mechanisms underlying visual and semantic processing: Implications from “optic aphasia.”  J Cogn Neurosci. 1995;  7 457-478
• 39 Riddoch M J, Humphreys G W. Visual object processing in optic aphasia: a case of semantic access agnosia.  Cogn Neuropsychol. 1987;  4 131-185
• 40 Iorio L, Falanga A, Fragassi N A, Grossi D. Visual associative agnosia and optic aphasia: a single case study and review of the syndromes.  Cortex. 1992;  28 23-37
• 41 Marr D, Nishihara H K. Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes.  Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1978;  200 269-294
• 42 Palmer S E. Hierarchical structure in perceptual representation.  Cognit Psychol. 1977;  9 441-474
• 43 Rumelhart D E, Hinton G E, Williams R J. Learning representations by back-propagating errors.  Nature. 1986;  323 533-536
• 44 Williams R J, Peng J. An efficient gradient-based algorithm for on-line training of recurrent network trajectories.  Neural Comput. 1990;  2 490-501
• 45 Bayles K A, Tomoeda K, McKnight P, Helm-Estabrooks N, Hawley J. Verbal perseveration in individuals with Alzheimer's disease. Semin Speech Lang 2004 25: 335-348
• 46 Rumelhart D E, McClelland J L. PDP Research Group .Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microstructure of Cognition, Vol. I. Cambridge, MA; MIT Press 1986
• 47 Kohn S E, Goodglass H. Picture naming in aphasia.  Brain Lang. 1985;  24 266-283
• 48 McNamara P, Albert M L. Neuropharmacology of verbal perseveration.  Semin Speech Lang. 2004;  25 309-322
• 49 Fuld P A, Katzman R, Davies P, Terry R D. Intrusions as a sign of Alzheimer's dementia: chemical and pathological verification.  Ann Neurol. 1982;  11 155-159
• 50 Sandson J, Albert M L. Perseveration in behavioral neurology.  Neurology. 1987;  37 1736-1741
• 51 Hasselmo M E. Neuromodulation and cortical function: modeling the physiological basis of behavior.  Behav Brain Res. 1995;  67 1-27
• 52 Selden N R, Gitelman D R, Salamon-Murayama N, Parrish T B, Mesulam M M. Trajectories of cholinergic pathways within the cerebral hemispheres of the human brain.  Brain. 1998;  121 2249-2257
• 53 Shelton J R, Martin R C. How semantic is automatic semantic priming?.  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1992;  18 1191-1210
• 54 Neely J H. Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: a selective review of current findings and theories. In: Besner D, Humphreys GW Basic Processes in Reading. Hillsdale, NJ; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 1991: 264-336
• 55 Gotts S J, Plaut D C. The impact of synaptic depression following brain damage: a connectionist account of “access” and “degraded-store” semantic impairments.  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2002;  2 187-213
• 56 Nelson S B, Sjostrom P J, Turrigiano G G. Rate and timing in cortical synaptic plasticity.  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2002;  357 1851-1857